ArticleCirculation reports2026
Association of Weight Loss With Improvement in Metabolic Status Among People Eligible for the Specific Health Guidance Program.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obesity as a Systemic Disease: Metabolic Benefits of Modest Weight Reduction in Specific Health Guidance-Eligible Individuals.Circulation reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While international guidelines recommend 5-10% body weight reduction, evidence characterizing the dose-response relationship between specific weight loss amounts and metabolic syndrome (MetS) resolution in real-world populations is limited. Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, we analyzed a large-scale health check-up database provided by DeSC Healthcare (Tokyo, Japan). We identified 37,256 individuals with baseline MetS eligible for the Specific Health Guidance (SHG) program (2014-2023). Logistic regression assessed the association between 1-year weight changes and subsequent MetS status. Weight loss was significantly linked to MetS resolution. Compared with weight maintenance, a weight loss of 2.0-2.9 kg showed an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.49), and a loss of ≥3.0 kg showed an OR of 0.19 (95% CI 0.18-0.21). These associations were consistent across age and sex subgroups. Secondary analyses confirmed significant improvements in waist circumference, blood pressure, lipid profiles, and HbA1c. Conclusions: Weight loss over 1 year is significantly associated with MetS resolution among SHG-eligible individuals. These findings support the validity of weight loss recommendations in the fourth phase of the SHG program and offer empirical data for future health guidance design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.