Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273232›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2026

Uncertainty Quantification of Central Canal Stenosis Deep Learning Classifier From Lumbar Sagittal T2-Weighted MRI.

Adriana Brenzikofer, Maria Monzon, Fabio Galbusera, Zina-Mary Manjaly, Andrea Cina, Catherine R Jutzeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adriana BrenzikoferDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Maria MonzonDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-0909
Fabio GalbuseraDepartment of Teaching, Research and Development Schulthess Clinic Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-9190
Zina-Mary ManjalyDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
Andrea CinaDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-6200
Catherine R JutzelerDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of the severity of central canal stenosis (CCS) on lumbar spine MRI is critical for clinical decision-making. We evaluated deep learning models for automated CCS grading on sagittal T2-weighted MRI, focusing on uncertainty quantification to improve clinical reliability. Methods: Using a retrospective cohort from the LumbarDISC dataset (1974 patients), we compared multiple deep learning architectures for three-level CCS classification (normal/mild, moderate, severe). To assess model confidence, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout and Test Time Augmentation (TTA) techniques were applied to quantify prediction uncertainty. Results: The fine-tuned Spine Grading Network (SGN) achieved a balanced accuracy of 79.4% and a macro F1 score of 68.8%, with per-class accuracies of 71.3% for moderate and 78.5% for severe stenosis. MC dropout revealed an increase in uncertainty predominantly in moderate and severe cases, while TTA uncertainty was higher for mild stenosis. Conclusion: DL-based CCS grading demonstrates potential to assist radiologists by providing rapid, standardized evaluations. Incorporating uncertainty quantification offers a safeguard to flag ambiguous cases, thus supporting clinical trust and facilitating safer integration of AI tools into the interpretation of spine MRI.

Indexed as

central canal stenosisconvolutional neural networkslumbar MRIuncertainty estimation

Identifiers

PMID42273232
PMCPMC13246319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.