ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Yield-quality relationships under deficit irrigation in greenhouse tomato: modulation by seaweed biostimulants.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Water availability is a crucial factor for crop performance in greenhouse tomato production, affecting both yield development and fruit composition traits. This study examined how deficit irrigation alters the relationship between yield and quality in tomatoes and whether foliar application of seaweed-derived biostimulants impacts these responses. Methods: A greenhouse experiment was carried out under two different irrigation levels, characterized by soil moisture contents of approximately 23-27% under optimal watering and 12-15% under reduced watering, using treatments based on extracts of Laminaria digitata and Ascophyllum nodosum, applied separately and together. Yield components, temporal yield dynamics, and concentration-related compositional traits were evaluated, and integrative PCA and concentration-index analyses were performed. Results: Reduced irrigation altered the yield structure by increasing fruit number and decreasing average fruit weight, while total yield showed limited variation among treatments. At the same time, concentration-related traits, including dry matter, soluble solids, vitamin C, and titratable acidity, were consistently higher under reduced irrigation. Biostimulant effects were dependent on the irrigation regime. Under optimal irrigation, treatment effects were limited, whereas under reduced irrigation, some treatments were associated with higher yields, primarily due to differences in fruit number during the main production peak. However, these yield responses were not consistently aligned with changes in compositional traits. Temporal yield analysis further showed that treatment effects under reduced irrigation were expressed mainly through modifications in the timing and intensity of peak production rather than through uniform effects across the entire production cycle. Integrative PCA and concentration-index analysis indicated that compositional enhancement and yield performance were only partly associated under reduced irrigation, suggesting a partial decoupling between productivity and fruit quality responses. Discussion: Overall, the results show that the irrigation regime is the main factor influencing yield-quality relationships in greenhouse tomato, while biostimulant treatments add extra, context-dependent variability. These findings emphasize the importance of evaluating both yield components and compositional traits together when analyzing crop responses under limited water availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.