ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Climate-resilient
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change poses a growing threat to durum wheat production in Mediterranean semi-arid regions, mainly through rising temperatures, frequent water shortages, and increased genotype × environment interactions. Methods: Over five consecutive growing seasons (2021-2025), ten durum wheat genotypes were evaluated across three rainfed environments in Algeria: Oued Smar, Sétif, and El Khroub. Agronomic performance, yield stability, and grain quality were assessed using ANOVA, AMMI, ASI, GGE biplots, drought tolerance indices (STI, DSI, and YSI), and supervised machine learning models coupled with SHAP-based interpretation. Results: Environment, genotype, and genotype × environment interaction had highly significant effects on grain yield. Yield differences exceeded 50% between sites. Waha and Skh/hau.heca-1 were identified as broadly adapted and stable genotypes, whereas Ammar-8, Da-6blak, and Lahaucan showed high yield potential but stronger environmental sensitivity. SHAP analysis indicated that precipitation and water deficit were the main drivers of yield variability, together explaining 50% of model importance, followed by grain number and soil plant-available water capacity. Discussion: The integration of stability analysis, drought tolerance indices, and explainable machine learning provides a robust framework for identifying climateresilient durum wheat genotypes and guiding targeted varietal deployment under Mediterranean rainfed conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.