Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273199›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Empowering health care staff to address health inequalities: A policy-focused evidence brief.

Danielle Lamb, Sashika Harasgama, Amy Dehn Lunn, Camille Gajria, Helena Painter, Helen Pearce, Alice Vodden, Adnaan Ghanchi, John Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danielle LambNIHR Applied Research Collaboration, UCL, UK.
Sashika HarasgamaWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Amy Dehn LunnWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Camille GajriaInstitute of Health Sciences Education, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Helena PainterWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Helen PearceWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Alice VoddenUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Adnaan GhanchiDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.
John FordWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The policy challenge: Leveraging the health care workforce to take action on health and care inequalities has significant potential, with the NHS in England employing 1.5 million people. Minority ethnic groups are over-represented in the NHS workforce, but underrepresented in senior roles, with high discrimination rates and limited career progression. Chronic workforce shortages exacerbate these issues, increasing workloads and reducing morale. Additionally, inequitable staff distribution, favouring affluent areas over deprived ones, hinders progress in disadvantaged communities. Systemic changes are needed to promote equity in the workforce and close health inequalities gaps. Here, we review the policy-focused evidence that explores how to empower healthcare staff to address inequalities. Key evidence to inform policy: We identified four key themes of how staff can be empowered to address health and care inequalities: 1) empowering through skills, 2) empowering through resources, 3) empowering through workforce structure, and 4) empowering through staff champions. There is evidence that training in cultural competency, anti-racism, anti-stigma, advocacy, health literacy, and game-based training can empower staff. However, these interventions require adequate time and should be complimented by innovative care models, such as trauma-informed care. Furthermore, the workforce should be diverse at all levels with enhanced professional development for employees from underrepresented backgrounds. Staff champion programmes can promote workforce equality, fostering collaboration and innovation. Further considerations and implications: Research on staff empowerment to tackle inequalities is limited and often focuses on staff rather than patient outcomes. There are also challenges in measuring cultural competence and comparing studies. Key training areas include cultural competency (ethnicity, LGBTQ+, and mental health), anti-stigma, anti-racism, advocacy, and low health literacy perspectives. Organisations should provide culturally competent resources, promote trauma-informed care, and ensure staff have sufficient time to support patients with complex needs and equity-focused improvements.

Indexed as

Cultural competencyHealth inequalitiesWorkforce empowerment

Identifiers

PMID42273199
PMCPMC13247703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.