Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273194›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026

Improving case-finding of long-term health problems in disadvantaged communities: A Policy-focused Evidence Brief.

Adnaan Ghanchi, Anita Patel, Helena Painter, Isla Kuhn, Anna Gkiouleka, Ian Holdroyd, Danielle Lamb, John Ford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adnaan GhanchiDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.
Anita PatelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK.
Helena PainterWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Isla KuhnUniversity of Cambridge Medical Library, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Anna GkioulekaWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Ian HoldroydWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Danielle LambNIHR Applied Research Collaboration, UCL, UK.
John FordWolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current challenges: Case finding, which actively identifies undiagnosed conditions, is key to tackling the growing chronic disease burden, especially in disadvantaged groups. Diseases like type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease already cause millions of preventable deaths, with numbers rising due to aging populations, urbanization, and widening inequalities. The poorest communities bear the heaviest load, with higher disease rates and lower diagnosis. Traditional healthcare models, which wait for patients to seek care, leave millions undiagnosed and untreated. Proactive case finding is a proven way to reduce disparities, improve outcomes, and ease the strain on healthcare systems. Key evidence to inform policy: This review identified two main approaches: targeted searches of primary care electronic health records (EHRs) to identify and engage high-risk individuals, and opportunistic screening in community, workplace, and emergency department settings. Systematic reviews and smaller observational studies, predominantly from high-income healthcare systems, support community-based health checks in trusted venues, workplace hypertension screening, and follow-up of elevated blood pressure readings in emergency departments, though evidence for these approaches is more limited. A stepped-wedge RCT found that targeted outreach nearly doubled diagnosis and treatment rates for cardiovascular risk factors compared with opportunistic case-finding (19.7% vs 10.8%). Meta-analyses of over 480,000 women found that self-sampling approximately doubled cervical screening uptake, with uptake increasing threefold when combined with community health worker support among under-screened ethnic minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged women. A cluster-randomised trial of over 74,000 participants showed that active case-finding using symptom questionnaires and handheld flowmeters identified four times more undiagnosed COPD than opportunistic screening, and was cost-effective at £16,596 per QALY gained. Further considerations and implications: This review identifies targeted case-finding in underserved communities as an evidence-based, high-impact strategy for early detection of chronic disease, provided it is integrated with sufficient downstream diagnostic and treatment capacity.

Indexed as

Case findingChronic disease screeningHealth inequalities

Identifiers

PMID42273194
PMCPMC13247691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.