ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Deep learning-assisted creation of a large-scale cone beam computed tomography dataset for the segmentation of impacted mandibular third molar.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Impacted third molar (ITM) extraction is a common procedure in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The segmentation of ITM is a crucial step in surgery planning. Manually segmenting ITM via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images requires significant time and effort from clinicians and may lead to treatment delays. With the advancement of deep learning, medical image segmentation is gradually becoming automated, but it still requires large amounts of well-annotated data for training. The aim of this study was to construct a large-scale CBCT dataset with the assistance of deep learning methods for the segmentation of ITM. Methods: A large-scale CBCT dataset for mandibular ITM segmentation, named "ITM-mandibular nerve (ITM-MN)", was constructed and comprised 1,262 CBCT image volumes, 186 expert manual annotations, and 1,076 deep learning-assisted annotations. The AttentionUnet3D model, based on an attention mechanism, was employed with a merged annotation strategy to adaptively focus on important feature regions for segmentation tasks. Results: On the ITM-MN dataset, AttentionUnet3D achieved the best segmentation results compared to other models, with an average Dice coefficient of 86.46%, an average recall of 84.69%, and a Hausdorff distance of 48.49 mm. The speed of deep learning-assisted annotation was only 16.51±3.78 seconds per case, with quality assessment scores of 3.07±0.66 and 3.29±0.74 from two physicians, respectively. Conclusions: ITM-MN is the first large-scale CBCT dataset specifically designed for segmenting ITM. The AttentionUnet3D model achieved effective automatic segmentation of ITM, second molars, and the MN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.