Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273126›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

A novel speckle-tracking index for predicting mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Yuanqi Yang, Xi Li, Wenxia Zhou, Yuyan Cai, Yujia Liang, Zhengang Zhao, Qiao Li, Jiafu Wei, Yong Peng, Wei Meng and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yuanqi YangLaboratory of Cardiac Structure and Function, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7571-4539
Xi LiLaboratory of Cardiac Structure and Function, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenxia ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuyan CaiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yujia LiangDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhengang ZhaoLaboratory of Cardiac Structure and Function, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiao LiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jiafu WeiDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yong PengLaboratory of Cardiac Structure and Function, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei MengDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan FengDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hong TangDepartment of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin WeiLaboratory of Cardiac Structure and Function, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-8651
Mao ChenLaboratory of Cardiac Structure and Function, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: (TAVR) are associated with cardiac damage, especially in those with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. RV dyssynchrony is a novel prognostic indicator in PH patients, but its prognostic value in TAVR patients is unclear. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of RV dyssynchrony in TAVR patients. Methods: A total of 1,052 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVR between April 2012 and December 2021 were studied. The primary endpoint was 3-year mortality. RVSD4 was defined as the standard deviation of the times to peak-systolic strain for the four mid-basal RV segments by two-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), and RV dyssynchrony was defined as RVSD4 >18 ms. Results: After 3-year follow-up, 182 patients (17.3%) died. Compared with the survivors, the non-survivors were older, included less females, had more comorbidities, comprised more patients with a pacemaker and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV, had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score, worse laboratory data, and worse cardiac function. Cox regression analysis showed NYHA functional class III/IV [hazard ratio (HR): 2.134, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.193-3.816, P=0.011], estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; HR: 0.990, 95% CI: 0.980-1.000, P=0.044), and RVSD4 (HR: 1.028, 95% CI: 1.024-1.032, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for the mortality of patients after TAVR, and the fully adjusted multivariable HR of RV dyssynchrony was 4.008 (95% CI: 2.541-6.323). Additionally, a graded association between RV dyssynchrony and mortality at 3 years (P<0.001) was robustly revealed by Kaplan-Meier analyses. Conclusions: RV dyssynchrony is an independent and robust risk factor for 3-year mortality in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, and RVSD4 can be utilized as a risk stratification tool to prognosticate the long-term mortality of those patients.

Indexed as

aortic stenosis (AS)mortalityRight ventricular dyssynchrony (RV dyssynchrony)speckle-trackingtranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Identifiers

PMID42273126
PMCPMC13247937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.