ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Automated full-process pipeline via multi-parametric MRI for tumor segmentation, molecular subtype classification and prognostic factor analysis in breast cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification of molecular subtypes and prognostic factors is crucial for personalized breast cancer management. Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) offers comprehensive, non-invasive characterization of tumors by capturing complementary information on morphology, perfusion, and tissue microstructure, but conventional radiologic assessment is often inadequate for reliably inferring molecular subtype or prognostic factors. Existing deep learning (DL) approaches depend on manually delineated tumor regions to define inputs, which is difficult to scale in routine practice. We therefore propose an automated end-to-end DL pipeline that jointly performs tumor segmentation and biomarker prediction directly from mp-MRI. Methods: In this multicenter study, mp-MRI data from 484 patients with breast cancer were collected from three institutions. The pipeline first used a three-dimensional U-Net (3D U-Net) for automated tumor segmentation and then a two-dimensional Residual Network (2D ResNet)-based classifier for predicting molecular subtypes and prognostic factors. Segmentation performance was quantified using mean intersection over union (mIoU) and mean dice similarity coefficient (mDice). Classification performance was assessed through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), complemented by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score metrics. The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs between models based on automated segmentation regions of interest (ROIs) and manually delineated ROIs. Results: The model achieved robust segmentation performance in the validation set (mIoU =0.772, mDice =0.864) and external cohorts (mIoU =0.732-0.746, mDice =0.838-0.848). For molecular subtyping, triple-negative (TN) differentiation achieved the best performance (AUC: validation =0.839, external =0.729-0.749). Axillary lymph node (ALN) status prediction yielded AUCs of 0.773, 0.715, and 0.700, respectively. Ki67 expression prediction demonstrated high generalizability (AUC: validation =0.788, external =0.749-0.784). No statistically significant differences were observed in classification performance between models based on automated segmentation ROIs and those based on manually delineated ROIs (all P>0.05). Conclusions: The automated end-to-end pipeline integrates 3D U-Net-based tumor segmentation and 2D ResNet-based biomarker classification, supporting its potential as a complementary tool for diagnostics, treatment planning, and prognostic assessment in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.