ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
MBUCF: a cross-fusion method for multimodal breast ultrasound based on multidimensional features.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC), characterized by high incidence and mortality rates, poses a severe threat to the life and health of women worldwide. Early, accurate identification is crucial for improving patient prognosis. Existing single-modal ultrasound techniques are insufficient to meet clinical needs. This study aims to establish a high-performance, lightweight multimodal ultrasound fusion model, providing a feasible method for distinguishing benign from malignant breast tumors. Methods: Conventional ultrasound and elastography images of 227 patients with breast tumors were collected from Tianjin Cancer Institute and Hospital. After image registration, region of interest (ROI) annotation, and feature extraction, 581-dimensional features were extracted. A feature selection method of variance rough screening-information rough screening-sparse regression was adopted to select 10% of core features to achieve model lightweighting. Two models, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), were selected. Scale_pos_weight and synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) were used to handle class imbalance, and relevant parameters were set empirically. In this study, metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), balanced accuracy (balanced Acc), and macro F1-score (F1-macro) were used to evaluate the performance of the model. Results: The proposed feature_cross fusion method in this study achieved the optimal performance. Under the full‑feature setting, the optimal model yielded an AUC of 0.8655 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7518-0.9539], a balanced Acc of 0.7652, and an F1‑macro of 0.7598. When only 10% of the features were retained, the model still maintained excellent performance with an AUC of 0.8258 (95% CI: 0.7083-0.9365), a balanced Acc of 0.7614, and an F1‑macro of 0.7608, and effectively achieved model lightweighting. Conclusions: The multimodal ultrasound model based on feature cross-fusion can effectively improve the accuracy of distinguishing benign from malignant breast tumors and meet the lightweight requirement, providing a feasible tool for the early non-invasive diagnosis of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.