ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
The collection of speech data for the assessment of cognition remotely: Balancing ethical and practical challenges.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Speech biomarkers could form a critical step in improving the accessibility, scalability, and early detection of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. However, ethical and practical challenges remain across regulatory and cultural contexts. In this paper, we briefly review the challenges in adopting speech biomarkers, relate our experiences globally to recent advances in the neurodegenerative field, and consider how speech assessments could be integrated into clinical care. Insights from high- and low- and middle-income countries (Taiwan, Ghana, Colombia, Brazil, Greece, UK, and US) demonstrate the potential impact of speech technology. While there are common benefits, risks, incentives, and hurdles, many aspects are specific to country or region. There is a need for more speech data sets (particularly in languages other than English), standardization in data collection and analysis, stronger collaboration between machine learning and neurodegenerative disease experts, unified privacy regulation, and finally, a consensus on the clinical interpretation of speech biomarker data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.