ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Customized 3D-printed component-preserving reconstruction for femoral neck fracture revision in a long-term survivor of pediatric osteosarcoma: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Late proximal femoral fractures in long-term survivors with childhood tumor endoprostheses are rare and technically challenging. When the proximal femur lacks a usable medullary canal but the distal tumor prosthesis remains stable, reconstruction is difficult and total femoral replacement may be excessively invasive. Case presentation: A 28-year-old man with a history of distal femoral osteosarcoma treated in childhood with knee tumor prosthesis replacement presented after a fall with severe right hip pain and inability to bear weight. Imaging confirmed a displaced femoral neck fracture, while the distal prosthesis remained well fixed. To preserve the stable distal component, we performed a component-preserving reconstruction using a customized monoblock stem with a socket-type prosthesis-to-prosthesis coupling design. The construct was stabilized with vancomycin-loaded PMMA cement, locking screws, and a lateral anti-rotation plate, and a dual-mobility head was implanted. Postoperative radiographs showed satisfactory alignment and positioning. Limb-length discrepancy improved from approximately 20 cm to 15 cm. At 3 months, the Harris Hip Score was 63; at approximately 6 months, it improved to 81, with continued functional recovery. Conclusion: This case suggests that customized component-preserving reconstruction may be a feasible alternative to total femoral replacement in selected patients with complex proximal femoral defects and retained stable distal tumor prostheses. Longer follow-up is needed to determine durability and late complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.