Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273037›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Development and validation of a machine learning model for predicting adverse prognosis in Wallerian degeneration patients based on clinical and imaging data.

Zhiqi Yu, Xujie Wang, Ruiqi Tian, Siyue Chen, Wei Tang, Xuhui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhiqi Yu *Department of Neurology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated with Dalian University, Shahekou, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xujie Wang *Department of Emergency ICU, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Chengxi, Xining, Qinghai, China.
Ruiqi Tian *Department of Neurology, Yan'an University Medical College No.3 Affiliated Hospital, Weicheng, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China.
Siyue ChenDepartment of Neurology, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Wei TangDepartment of Neurology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated with Dalian University, Shahekou, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xuhui LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Chengguan, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Wallerian degeneration (WD) is a neurodegenerative change that often leads to irreversible neurological dysfunction in the central nervous system, resulting in poor prognosis. Currently, there is a lack of predictive tools capable of estimating the risk of poor prognosis in WD patients. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based predictive model to assess the risk of poor prognosis in WD patients, with the outcome measure of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assessed at least 3 months after WD diagnosis by imaging. Methods: The data for this study were sourced from Xinhua Hospital, affiliated with Dalian University. Clinical patient data were randomly split into a training set and a validation set in a 7/3 ratio. Based on the AIC/BIC criteria, the Boruta algorithm and multivariable logistic regression were used for variable selection, and eight machine learning models were constructed. The models were evaluated for discrimination, predictive accuracy, and clinical benefit using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, SHAP values were used to systematically evaluate feature importance in the best-performing machine learning model. Results: A total of 285 WD patients were included in the study, with a median age of 63 years. Among them, 157 (55.09%) were male and 128 (44.91%) were female, and 161 (56.49%) patients had poor prognosis. Ten candidate predictors for poor prognosis in WD were identified through analysis: diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, NIHSS score, medulla oblongata, periventricular region, centrum semiovale, subcortical volume 1,000, and the severity of WD. Seven of the ten predictors showed statistical significance, while three demonstrated a borderline association. Among the evaluated machine learning models, the AdaBoost model (AUC = 0.880) demonstrated the most stable performance in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical benefit. SHAP analysis indicated that NIHSS score, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension made significant contributions to predicting poor prognosis in WD patients. Conclusion: Our study successfully developed and validated a machine learning predictive model that integrates clinical indicators and imaging data to estimate the risk of poor prognosis in WD patients. This model may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk individuals and provide evidence-based guidance for early intervention and personalized management.

Indexed as

machine learningpoor prognosis riskpredictive modelSHAPWallerian degeneration

Identifiers

PMID42273037
PMCPMC13246421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.