Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42273035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

A homozygous missense variant, p.Ser166Leu in the

Onur Emre Onat, Shilpa Sonti, Daphne Robakis, Ayse B Tekinay, Cenk Akbostanci, F Nazli Durmaz Celik, Tayfun Ozcelik, Lorraine N Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Onur Emre Onat *Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Shilpa Sonti *Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Daphne RobakisDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Ayse B TekinayInstitute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Cenk AkbostanciDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
F Nazli Durmaz CelikDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye.
Tayfun OzcelikDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Lorraine N ClarkDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We leveraged consanguinity and population endogamy in a large four generation Turkish family with ET. Examination of clinical features and genetic analysis identified a homozygous Methods: The ET family is of Turkish origin. The proband and relatives were evaluated at Ankara University Medical School and Bilkent University (Ankara, Turkey). A second evaluation of the clinical and videotape data was performed at Yale University. A total of 6 individuals from the family were clinically assessed. Whole genome sequencing and autozygosity mapping was performed in affected and unaffected family members. Transient transfection of HEK293T cells was performed to assess pathogenicity of the Results: A total of 4 family members were diagnosed with ET; two individuals also had a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (PD). We identified a missense variant in Discussion: The

Indexed as

consanguinityessential tremorneurological disordernuclear speckle proteinParkinson’s diseasePRPF40BtremorTurkish

Identifiers

PMID42273035
PMCPMC13247433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.