Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272971›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2026

Use of a composite, 3D-printed patch as a partial airway replacement: A pilot study on the porcine model.

Marco Mammana, Alessandro Gandin, Giovanni Zambello, Margherita Pelosin, Alberto Elmi, Domenico Ventrella, Silvia Todros, Veronica Torresan, Federica Pezzuto, Marco Pietra and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marco MammanaThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padua Padua Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0885-2403
Alessandro GandinDepartment of Industrial Engineering University of Padua Padua Italy.
Giovanni ZambelloThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padua Padua Italy.
Margherita PelosinDepartment of Industrial Engineering University of Padua Padua Italy.
Alberto ElmiDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Domenico VentrellaDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Silvia TodrosDepartment of Industrial Engineering University of Padua Padua Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-9672
Veronica TorresanDepartment of Industrial Engineering University of Padua Padua Italy.
Federica PezzutoPathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health Padua University Hospital Padua Italy.
Marco PietraDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Noemi RomagnoliDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna Bologna Italy.
Andrea Dell'AmoreThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padua Padua Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-7441
Maria Laura BacciDepartment of Veterinary Medical Sciences Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna Bologna Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6702-5868
Fiorella CalabresePathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health Padua University Hospital Padua Italy.
Giovanna BrusatinDepartment of Industrial Engineering University of Padua Padua Italy.
Federico ReaThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padua Padua Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracheal replacement is an unmet clinical need, as patients with long or complex airway defects are managed with tracheostomy or permanent stents. Experimental and clinical research is ongoing in order to find safe airway substitutes; however, the strategies under investigation suffer from major limitations, such as unsatisfactory re-epithelialization, insufficient long-term mechanical support, and complex ex vivo procedures. A ready-to-use and stable patch, able to support airway functionality and tissue regeneration, remains a significant challenge. Here we present the development of an off-the-shelf composite patch consisting of a resorbable polymer to aid epithelial restoration and a 3D-printed multimaterial structure to guarantee effective mechanical stability. To evaluate the prosthesis performance, we designed a pilot study on a large animal setting, monitoring postoperative survival and airway healing for up to 60 days. An anterior cervical tracheal defect was created on four domestic pigs and patched with the prosthesis. The results were satisfactory in terms of postoperative survival, as only one animal died before the end of the study. However, endoscopic findings revealed a worsening stenosis due to wound contraction, granulation tissue formation, and partial displacement of the prosthesis. These findings were confirmed at histology, where a prominent inflammatory infiltrate was evident. Blood tests performed during follow-up did not reveal any systemic inflammatory reaction. Overall, we believe that further optimization of the prosthesis design and materials is necessary in order to create an ideal "off-the-shelf" tracheal substitute. Nevertheless, this pilot study provides promising results and novel insights into a clinically relevant research area.

Indexed as

3D printingbiomaterialstracheal replacement

Identifiers

PMID42272971
PMCPMC13247404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.