ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2026
How microrobots should be translated: A clinical and value-centered readiness framework.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic nanorobots in oncology: From targeted drug delivery to smart theranostic systems.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- From imaging enhancement to surgical autonomy: the evolutionary role of nanotechnology in AI-driven robotic surgery.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Task-Oriented Biomedical Microrobots: Access, Working Environment, Actuation, Body Design, Detection and Control.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Review of Gastrointestinal Capsule Robots: Materials, Actuation, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Hierarchically Engineered Magnetic-Enzymatic Microrobots with Stimuli-Induced Disassembly for Controlled Navigation and Mucosal Penetration in 3D Lung Fibrosis Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Expert Perspectives on a Conceptual Autonomous Mini Surgical Robot for Gynecological Procedures: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Non-survival rat endovascular testbed for early-stage evaluation of untethered magnetic microrobots.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Physiologically Adaptive Soft Millirobot for Atraumatic Endovascular Therapy.Advanced functional materials · 2026Article
- Autonomous Microrobots for Spatiotemporally Active Therapeutic Delivery and Controlled Release.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Untethered mobile milli/microrobots hold transformative potential for interventional medicine by enabling more precise and entirely non-invasive diagnosis and therapy. Realizing this promise requires bridging the gap between groundbreaking laboratory demonstrations and successful clinical integration. Despite remarkable technical progress over the past two decades, most millirobots and microrobots remain confined to laboratory proof-of-concept demonstrations, with limited real-world feasibility. Here, we identify key factors that slow translation from bench to bedside, focusing on the disconnect between technical innovation and meaningful patient outcomes. We argue that the long-term impact and sustainability of the field depend on aligning development with unmet clinical needs, demonstrating feasibility, value and integration potential into existing clinical workflows. To foster translational research of milli/microrobots, we introduce a strategic milli/microrobot Technology Readiness Level framework (mTRL), which maps system development from initial conceptualization to clinical adoption through clearly defined milestones and their associated stepwise activities. The mTRL model provides a structured gauge of technological maturity, a common language for multi-disciplinary collaboration and actionable guidance to accelerate translational development toward new, safer and more efficient interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.