ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2026
Surgical fecal diversion
Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical fecal diversionWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerineal necrotizing soft tissue infections (P-NSTI) are aggressive and potentially fatal conditions. Surgical fecal diversion (SFD) is often used to reduce contamination, but whether non-diversion provides comparable outcomes remains uncertain. We hypothesized that non-diversion does not confer worse outcomes than SFD.
aimTo evaluate clinical outcomes of non-diversion compared with SFD in adults with P-NSTI.
methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and Cochrane standards. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched without date restrictions. Adults with P-NSTI comparing non-diversion
resultsThirty-six studies including 1751 patients were analyzed. In studies with reconstructed groups, mortality favored non-diversion, whereas no difference was observed in studies with predefined groups. Overall pooled analysis showed lower mortality with non-diversion (odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.91;
conclusionNo consistent outcome differences are demonstrated between non-diversion and SFD, and apparent mortality differences likely reflect baseline severity rather than treatment effect, with insufficient evidence to define superiority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.