Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272873›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2026

Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy

Jaydeep Jain, Shiv C Navriya, Ravi Chandra Chintapalli, Gautam R Choudhary, Mahendra Singh, Deepak P Bhirud, Arjun S Sandhu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaydeep JainDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India.
Shiv C NavriyaDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India. drshivnavriya2004@gmail.com.
Ravi Chandra ChintapalliDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India.
Gautam R ChoudharyDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India.
Mahendra SinghDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India.
Deepak P BhirudDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India.
Arjun S SandhuDepartment of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342008, Rājasthān, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrolithiasis is one of the most prevalent condition with evolving management strategies. While extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) are common minimally invasive treatments, their comparative efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life (QoL) require continuous evaluation.

aimTo compare the clinical efficacy, safety, patient satisfaction, and economic outcomes of ESWL

methodsThis randomized controlled trial included 240 adult patients with confirmed lower ureteric calculi, allocated equally to ESWL or URSL groups. Baseline characteristics, stone parameters, procedural details, complications, and follow-up outcomes - including stone clearance, pain, QoL, workdays lost, cost, and satisfaction - were systematically analyzed over a 3-month follow-up.

resultsURSL demonstrated significantly higher stone-free rates at all time points (

conclusionURSL offers superior stone clearance, particularly for larger stones, with acceptable safety profiles. ESWL remains a viable non-invasive option for smaller stones, providing better QoL recovery and economic benefits. Individualized treatment planning is essential for optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute renal colicComplicationsCost-effectivenessExtracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyLower ureteric calculiQuality of lifeStone-free rateUreteroscopic lithotripsy

Identifiers

PMID42272873
PMCPMC13248055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.