Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272862›Full record

ReviewEXCLI journal2026

The New York City Marathon: A systematic review of performance, participation, pacing, and health-related outcomes.

Beat Knechtle, Mabliny Thuany, Pantelis T Nikolaidis, Pedro Forte, Luciano Bernardes Leite, Romuald Lepers, Daniela Chlíbková, Katja Weiss, Thomas Rosemann, Rodrigo L Vancini and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EXCLI journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Beat KnechtleMedbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Mabliny ThuanyDepartment of Sports, State University of Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Pantelis T NikolaidisSchool of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
Pedro ForteDepartment of Sports, Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal.
Luciano Bernardes LeiteDepartment of Physical Education, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
Romuald LepersUniversité Bourgogne Europe, INSERM, CAPS UMR 1093, Dijon, France.
Daniela ChlíbkováCentre of Sports Activities, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia.
Katja WeissInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rodrigo L VanciniCenter of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Sasa DuricLiberal Arts Department, American University of the Middle East, Egaila, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'New York City Marathon' is one of the world's largest and most influential mass-participation marathons. Although numerous studies have examined performance trends, participation patterns, pacing behavior, environmental influences, and physiological aspects of runners in this event, no review has synthesized the evidence specific to this race. This study aimed to systematically summarize the scientific literature on the 'New York City Marathon'. A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted using terms related to the 'New York City Marathon' to identify studies published up to February 2026. Eligible studies included runners of all ages, sexes, and performance levels, with no restrictions on publication date, topic, or study design. Extracted data included: (1) authors; (2) publication year; (3) study design; (4) sample characteristics; (5) variables assessed; and (6) main findings. Results were synthesized narratively by domain. Seventy-six publications met the inclusion criteria. Participation increased markedly over time, driven primarily by growth among women and age-group runners. While elite and competitive age-group performances improved in recent decades, mean finish times across the entire field increased by ~40 min since the 1970s, reflecting the democratization of marathon running. Ethiopian runners were the youngest and fastest. Peak performance occurred at 29.7 years in women and 34.8 years in men (1-year age intervals), and in the 30-34 and 35-39 age groups, respectively (5-year intervals). Approximately 10 % of runners experienced major injuries during training or the race that prevented starting or finishing. Higher training volumes increased injury risk, with foot, knee, and hip injuries most common, whereas adequate preparation reduced risk. Environmental conditions-particularly temperature-had a stronger influence on race times than course metrics. Performance declined with increasing temperature, especially among slower runners and among men aged 30-64 and women aged 40-64. Runners generally adopted a positive pacing strategy with a final spurt in the last segment (40-42.2 km). The fastest split occurred between 5-10 km and the slowest between 35-40 km, coinciding with the undulating terrain entering Central Park. Older athletes paced more evenly than younger athletes. Men showed a larger decrease in running speed from the fastest to the slowest splits than women (21.1 % vs. 16.7 %). Slower runners exhibited greater early-race deceleration but larger late-race speed increases, whereas faster runners maintained the most even pacing. Participation in the 'New York City Marathon' has grown substantially, driven by increased involvement of women and age-group runners. Although elite performance has improved, overall mean finish times have slowed due to broader participation. Ethiopian runners were the youngest and fastest, with peak performance occurring in the early to mid-30s. Injury prevalence was considerable, particularly with higher training volumes, though adequate preparation mitigated risk. Higher temperatures slowed performance, especially among slower runners. Pacing was predominantly positive, with older athletes pacing more evenly and faster runners showing the smallest performance decline. Future research should explore cardiovascular monitoring technologies-including real-time ECG streaming during the race-and assess the impact of innovations such as carbon-plated "supershoes" on performance and pacing. See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).

Indexed as

endurance runningenvironmental conditionsheartpacing

Identifiers

PMID42272862
PMCPMC13247178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.