ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world safety profile of mosunetuzumab: a pharmacovigilance study based on the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mosunetuzumab is a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody approved for adult relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Post-marketing evidence on its safety profile remains scarce. This pharmacovigilance study used the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)to characterize real-world adverse event (AE) signals associated with mosunetuzumab. Methods: We performed disproportionality analysis using reports from the FAERS database spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2025. The primary analysis set encompassed reports wherein mosunetuzumab was coded as the Primary Suspect (PS). Disproportionality analyses were performed using four algorithms: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma poisson shrinker (MGPS). After excluding implausible records, the time to onset (TTO)for AEs was summarized using the median and interquartile range. Results: Overall, 1154 FAERS reports mentioning mosunetuzumab were included in the primary analysis. 3 positive signals were identified at the System Organ Class (SOC)level. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neutropenia, tumour flare and infection-related events were frequently reported signals at the Preferred Term (PT)level. Additional disproportionate reporting signals were noted for cardiac events and eye disorders, including atrial fibrillation, uveitis. Of 310 reports with valid dates, most AEs occurred within 30 days following treatment initiation, whereas a nontrivial proportion was reported at ≥180 days. Conclusion: This study offers real-world evidence for guiding the clinical use of mosunetuzumab. It highlights the necessity for clinicians to monitor for AEs during treatment by recognizing potential adverse reaction signals beyond those documented in the current prescribing information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.