ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
3D printing visualization combined with home-school-hospital collaboration for clinical pharmacology teaching.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical pharmacology teaching is often limited by abstract content and insufficient integration of anatomical structure, physiological regulation, and drug targets. Traditional teaching models make it difficult for interns to transform theoretical knowledge into clinical application ability. Based on embodied cognition theory, 3D-printed visualization models can provide intuitive and perceptual learning support. This study aimed to construct an innovative teaching model integrating School-Family-Physician Collaboration (SFPC) and 3D intelligent printing teaching (3DIPT) for clinical pharmacology education. Methods: A non-randomized longitudinal pre-post intervention study was conducted among clinical interns. The experimental group received integrated teaching using 3D-printed anatomical and pharmacological models combined with real family and social scenarios. The control group received traditional theoretical teaching. Teaching effects were evaluated using objective test scores, target recognition accuracy, and questionnaire-based learning initiative and satisfaction. Results: The baseline data of the two groups were balanced and comparable (all P > 0.05). After intervention, the scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group in pharmacology knowledge test (67.23 ± 10.62 vs. 63.28 ± 7.35, P = 0.0028), SMC (5.618 ± 0.106 vs. 5.574 ± 0.104, P = 0.0232), self-directed learning ability (117.85 ± 1.78 vs. 117.10 ± 1.47, P = 0.0212), doctor-patient communication ability (21.54 ± 0.76 vs. 21.23 ± 0.73, P = 0.0204), and MSTLR (62.88 ± 8.36 vs. 58.73 ± 6.35, P = 0.0315), with statistically significant differences. Conclusion: The integrated SFPC-3DIPT teaching model can significantly improve interns' mastery of urogenital system pharmacology, enhance their understanding of physiological and pharmacological mechanisms, and increase learning initiative and clinical application ability. This model provides a feasible and effective reference for the reform of clinical pharmacology teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.