ArticleData in brief2026
Images dataset of pure and adulterated Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) flour with wood flour (sawdust) and gypsum (calcium sulfate) powder for machine learning based identification of Teff flour adulteration and prediction of the level adulteration.
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This data article presents an image dataset compiled for the purpose of machine learning-based identification and prediction of adulteration levels in Teff (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) flour. The dataset includes images of pure white, mixed, and red Teff flour varieties, as well as these flours adulterated with wood flour (sawdust) and gypsum (calcium sulfate) powder. Adulteration levels range from 10% to 40% in 5% increments. The data collection process involved preparing Teff flour from naturally dried and milled Teff grains. Samples of 100 grams of each Teff flour variety were then mixed with the adulterants at the specified concentrations. A total of 5000 raw images were captured using an 18-megapixel Canon EOS 7D camera under controlled studio lighting (300 W incandescent lamps), with the samples placed 30 cm from the camera lens in a 10 cm x 10 cm plastic box. To enhance the dataset's diversity and quantity, 25,000 augmented images were generated by shuffling image pixels' locations with various block sizes (1 × 1, 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 8 × 8, and 16 × 16). This dataset is a valuable resource for researchers and students in Teff adulteration using image processing and feature extraction. It also holds potential for use by Food and Drug Administration Authorities and law enforcement to develop automated methods for detecting Teff flour adulteration, offering an alternative to time-consuming physio-chemical laboratory tests. The dataset's structure and augmentation methods are detailed to ensure reproducibility and encourage further research into robust machine learning models for food quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.