ReviewOncoscience2026
Enhancing breast cancer detection with AI for early diagnosis and recurrence prediction.
Review in Oncoscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of death among women worldwide, early detection is critical for improving survival. Conventional screening modalities such as mammography, MRI, biopsy, and ultrasound have been pivotal for patient care, but face limitations, including human variability, interpretive errors, operator dependence, and high rates of false positives and negatives which can lead to unnecessary treatment and financial distress. To overcome these challenges, a more accurate and predictive diagnostic tool is needed. This article compares traditional breast cancer screening methods with AI-integrated approaches demonstrating how artificial intelligence enhances diagnostic precision, efficiency, and predictive capability. AI-assisted mammography has been shown to detect 29% more cancers than traditional mammography without increasing false positives and reduces radiologist reading time by 40%. AI-assisted 3D digital breast tomosynthesis detects 1.6 additional cancers per 1,000 screenings and reduces recall rates by 2.2% compared to 2D mammography. In MRI, AI predicted breast cancer development up to one year in advance and correctly localize future cancer sites in 57% of cases. In ultrasound, AI significantly improves diagnostic accuracy, particularly for less experienced radiologists. In biopsy, AI-enabled digital assays for recurrence prediction achieve higher predictive accuracy, with pathologists using AI being 62% faster and 72% more accurate. Integrating AI into breast cancer redefines diagnostic excellence, shifting breast cancer management toward a more proactive, precise, and patient-centered approach. Future research should focus on external validation of AI models across larger and diverse populations, cost-effectiveness to ensure equitable access and ethical consideration to ensure responsible clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.