ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Development of a machine learning-based mortality prediction model for patients with mental disorders and COVID-19.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patients with mental disorders are at increased risk of adverse outcomes from COVID-19, but prognostic evidence specific to this population remains limited. This study aimed to develop and validate machine-learning models for predicting 31-day mortality among hospitalized patients with mental disorders and laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 439 hospitalized patients across 10 hospitals in Henan Province, China. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 308) and an independent test cohort (n = 131). Oversampling was applied during model development to address class imbalance. Candidate predictors were selected using LASSO, Boruta, and random forest methods, and eight machine-learning algorithms were trained. SHAP analysis was used for model interpretation, and Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival between model-defined risk groups. Results: Patients were generally older, 63.1% were female, and comorbidities were common. Several models showed good discrimination in the training cohort, although some showed overfitting. In the test cohort, the neural network model with LASSO-selected features performed best, with an AUC of 0.911 (95% CI: 0.832-0.990). SHAP analysis identified concomitant hormone therapy, alkaline phosphatase, and lymphocyte count as the leading predictors. The high-risk group had significantly higher cumulative mortality than the low-risk group (log-rank P < 0.0001). Discussion: A machine-learning model based on routine clinical and laboratory variables may support short-term mortality risk stratification in this regional multicenter cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.