Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272736›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026

Overperceiving desire, underestimating age: a review of a narrow research lens.

Anne Obrecht, Christian Agrillo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne ObrechtDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Christian AgrilloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The male sexual overperception bias describes the male tendency to sometimes misinterpret friendliness in women as sexual interest. Sexual overperception is a risk factor for sexual coercion and therefore deserves special attention in research, especially since differences in this bias across age groups may lead to differences in coercion risk across the lifespan. Previous research has mainly worked with undergraduate students as participants. Considering that other behavioral biases were found to change across the lifespan, this tendency in research was hypothesized to prejudice the results. We reviewed the literature in this field, revealing a mean participant age of 22.9 years across studies on the topic of sexual overperception, which points to the presence of a potential research bias as a function of participants' age. As far as we are aware, no research efforts attempting to replicate previous findings in samples aged 40 + have been made. The implications of these findings are discussed as well as the possibility of sexual overperception bias as a universal phenomenon. We call for future investigation with older age groups as well as across different cultural contexts to form a broader picture in this field.

Indexed as

error management theoryinterpersonal perceptionparticipant sampling biassexual misperceptionsexual overperception bias

Identifiers

PMID42272736
PMCPMC13246672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.