ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Family health as a mediator between work-family conflict and depression in working parents: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although there is a growing body of research on work-family conflict and its impact on mental health, significant gaps in the literature remain. Objective: To investigate the mediating role of family health in the association between WFC and depression among Chinese working parents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the 2021 Psychology and Behavior Investigation of Chinese Residents, which included 5,068 working parents. Work-family conflict was measured using the Work-Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS), family health was assessed using the Short Form of the Family Health Scale (FHS-SF), and depression was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Logistic regression models and mediation analysis were employed to examine the relationships between WFC, family health, and depression. Results: The study found that 16.0% of participants reported symptoms of depression. Higher levels of WFC were significantly associated with an increased risk of depression (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.02), while higher family health scores were associated with a reduced risk of depression (OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Family health partially mediated the relationship between WFC and depression, accounting for 14.27% of the total effect. Younger parents (under 35 years of age) and those with multiple illnesses were at higher risk of depression. Conclusion: Family health plays a mediating role in the relationship between WFC and depression among Chinese working parents. Although the mediation effect is modest, it represents a large-scale investigation in a Chinese-speaking population, providing actionable metrics for public health screening. This study makes three contributions. Theoretically, it integrates COR theory and the W-HR model by positioning family health as a dynamic mediating resource; empirically, it provides a first large-scale, nationally representative quantification of this indirect pathway among working parents; and practically, it identifies a concrete, modifiable intervention target with actionable metrics for public health screening. These findings highlight the importance of holistic approaches that address both individual- and family-level factors in mental health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.