Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272730›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

Environmental factors influencing the development of elite athletes: a systematic review.

Jie Zhao, Xiaowei Peng, Changqing Xiang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie ZhaoSchool of Physical Education, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.
Xiaowei PengSchool of Physical Education, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.
Changqing XiangSchool of Physical Education, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elite athletes play a vital role in achieving success in competitive sports and have been a significant focus for researchers and coaches alike. To improve the development of elite athletes, this study systematically reviews the environmental factors that influence their growth. This study conducted a thorough search of the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and SportDiscus databases, screening the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Ultimately, we identified 15 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The results categorize the influencing factors into four main areas: human resources, family dynamics, team dynamics, and the broader social environment. Notably, the quality of coaching has a considerable impact on the effectiveness of training for elite athletes. The methods of communication used by coaches greatly influence how athletes acquire and develop their skills. Parental support and understanding are also crucial, as they provide the emotional encouragement that elite athletes need. A positive family atmosphere surrounding sports can effectively motivate children to participate in athletic activities. Additionally, a strong bond among teammates creates a supportive team environment, helping elite athletes face challenges with increased confidence. Furthermore, socio-economic factors and social policies significantly affect the training experiences of elite athletes. This study enhances our understanding of the key characteristics that influence the development of elite athletes and emphasizes the essential environmental factors that support their growth.

Indexed as

athlete growthelite athletesinfluencing factorsrelationshiptalent development

Identifiers

PMID42272730
PMCPMC13246381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.