ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mapping the olfactory mindscape in museums: a grounded theory investigation into smellscape perception and its impact on cultural tourism experience.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethnographic museums are increasingly visited as cultural tourism destinations, yet their exhibition design remains predominantly visual, overlooking the potential of smell to shape tourists' emotional engagement, memory, and well-being. While smellscape research has grown in environmental psychology, a process-oriented model explaining how visitors perceive and interpret culturally-coded odors in museum settings is still lacking. This study aims to investigate the cognitive-affective process underlying tourists' smellscape perception in an ethnographic museum and to construct a theoretical model that explains how olfactory experiences influence cultural meaning-making and behavioral responses. Adopting a constructivist grounded theory approach, we integrated participatory smell-walks with in-depth semi-structured interviews. Data were collected from 120 visitors at the Yunnan Ethnographic Museum (China). All participants completed a smell-walk and survey; 30 participated in follow-up interviews. Analysis followed open, axial, and selective coding using NVivo, with member-checking and researcher triangulation ensuring rigor. The analysis yielded a five-category theoretical model: (1) Smell Perception-detection and description of odors; (2) Smell Association-cognitive links to behaviors, memories, and environments (behavioral, subjective, perceptual, environmental); (3) Smellscape Evaluation-assessments of intensity, appropriateness, preference, safety, and harmony; (4) Environmental Expectation-desires for authenticity, atmospheric resonance, and emotional engagement; and (5) Cultural Export-potential for heritage innovation and enhanced tourist experience. The model delineates a dynamic pathway from sensory input to meaning-making and behavioral outcomes. This study provides the first grounded theory model of smellscape perception in an ethnographic museum from a tourism perspective. It advances sensory tourism research by demonstrating how strategically curated smellscapes can deepen emotional engagement, strengthen cultural memory, and enhance visitor well-being. The findings offer an evidence-based framework for designing multisensory heritage experiences that move beyond visual-centric practices, with direct implications for museum management and destination marketing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.