ArticlePregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Common data elements for maternal health research: Expert consensus emerging from a modified Delphi study.
Article in Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial for "Common data elements for maternal health research: Expert consensus emerging from a modified Delphi study".Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Common data elements (CDEs) are critical for providing consistency in data collection and promoting collaboration across research endeavors. This study aims to develop a minimum set of priority CDEs for maternal health research. Methods: The Results: Delphi panelists prioritized 36 biomedical and 22 psychosocial constructs for standardized data collection. A literature review identified 204 CDE candidates (89 biomedical and 115 psychosocial) for measuring priority constructs. Delphi panelists rated their validity and feasibility and, subsequently, endorsed top-rated CDEs. CDE recommendations include expert-endorsed, standardized measures for maternal health conditions, outcomes, medical care, health history, behavioral health, social factors, and demographics, with guidance on data sources, measurement methods, and ethical considerations. Conclusion: Through an expert consensus-building process, our study produced recommendations for harmonizing data collection of a minimum set of priority constructs for maternal health research. These CDEs are expected to help improve data quality and interoperability, fostering opportunities to synthesize information and advance maternal health science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.