Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272681›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Healthcare professionals' perception of equipment and infrastructure as determinants of quality in anesthesia and intensive care units.

Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Dorel Săndesc, Horaţiu Moldovan, Alice Nicoleta Drăgoescu, Andreea Stănculescu, Marius Papurică, Claudiu Rafael Barsac, Adelina Baloi, Ovidiu-Horea Bedreag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gabriel-Petre GoreckiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania.
Dorel SăndescDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania.
Horaţiu MoldovanFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Alice Nicoleta DrăgoescuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Andreea StănculescuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Marius PapuricăDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania.
Claudiu Rafael BarsacDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania.
Adelina BaloiDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania.
Ovidiu-Horea BedreagDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timişoara, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units (AICUs), hereafter referred to as Intensive Care Units (ICUs), represent high-risk clinical environments requiring advanced technology, adequate infrastructure, and specialized staff. This study explored healthcare professionals' perceptions of these structural factors and their influence on service quality across public and private hospitals in Romania. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative survey was conducted between 4 and 28 November 2024, involving 109 respondents (52.3% nurses, 22.9% ICU specialists, 17.4% residents, and 5.5% senior consultants). Data were collected using a 20-item online questionnaire distributed via institutional and professional networks using a convenience sampling strategy. Results: Results indicated that both sectors perceived their technological infrastructure as generally adequate, with slightly higher ratings in private institutions; however, differences were small and not statistically significant (χ Conclusions: The findings reflect healthcare professionals' perceptions of structural and organizational factors in ICUs. Equipment availability, infrastructure, and staffing were identified as important perceived elements associated with service quality. Given the cross-sectional design and perception-based data, results should be interpreted cautiously, particularly given the limited sample size and perception-based design. No statistically significant differences were observed between public and private hospitals for most variables (

Indexed as

equipment quality AICUhealthcare managementinfrastructure AICUintensive carequality in anesthesia and intensive care unitssafety culture hospital

Identifiers

PMID42272681
PMCPMC13246601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.