ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Study on diagnostic models for insomnia and gastralgia with Liver-Spleen Disharmony Syndrome based on machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of insomnia and gastralgia has recently increased. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) offers unique advantages in treating these conditions. Accurate syndrome differentiation is essential for effective treatment. However, as a common syndrome in TCM for these conditions, the diagnostic criteria for Liver-Spleen Disharmony Syndrome (LSDS) currently lack uniformity. Objective: To develop a machine learning-based diagnostic model for LSDS in patients with insomnia and/or gastralgia. Methods: In this prospective observational study, clinical data from 575 patients with insomnia and/or gastralgia were collected using structured scales. The data included demographic information and clinical symptoms related to LSDS. Six machine learning algorithms-Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID), C5.0 decision tree, Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), Radial Basis Function (RBF) network, Bayesian Network (BN), and Binomial Logistic Regression Analysis (BLRA)-were employed to construct diagnostic models for LSDS. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, confusion matrices, and precision-recall (P-R) curves. Results: The CHAID model outperformed all others, achieving an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.861-0.914), accuracy (AC) of 0.960, sensitivity (SE) of 0.972, specificity (SP) of 0.977, and an F1 score of 0.955. Prediction of variable importance in the CHAID model indicated that depression or irritability was the most important symptom variable for LSDS, followed by epigastric fullness, distending pain in hypochondrium, poor excretion of stool, diarrhea with abdominal pain, and excessive flatus. The C5.0 model ranked second (AUC = 0.797, accuracy = 0.958, F1 = 0.953). Other models showed progressively lower performance: BLRA (AUC = 0.648, accuracy = 0.947, F1 = 0.942), BPNN (AUC = 0.697, accuracy = 0.913, F1 = 0.901), BN (AUC = 0.538, accuracy = 0.944, F1 = 0.935), and RBF (AUC = 0.569, accuracy = 0.824, F1 = 0.810). Conclusion: We successfully developed a machine learning-based diagnostic model for Liver-Spleen Disharmony Syndrome (LSDS) in patients with insomnia and gastralgia. The CHAID model demonstrated superior performance and shows promise as an exploratory tool to assist clinicians; however, independent external validation is required before it can be considered for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.