Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272617›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2026

Quality of care and health insurance uptake in Namibia.

Nigel James, Yubraj Acharya, Ndilimeke Jc Nashandi, Stephen A Matthews, Yosef Bodovski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nigel JamesDepartment of Health Studies, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Richmond, Richmond, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-8976
Yubraj AcharyaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, Faculty of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9003-636X
Ndilimeke Jc NashandiDepartment of Psychology and Social Work, Faculty of Allied Health, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2295-4262
Stephen A MatthewsDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology and Demography, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-4854
Yosef BodovskiPopulation Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-1180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite efforts to expand health insurance in low- and middle-income countries, uptake remains low. Poor quality of care, especially in public facilities, is often cited as a barrier to health insurance enrolment but limited empirical evidence exists. Aim: We examine whether the quality of antenatal care (ANC) influences women's enrolment in health insurance programmes in Namibia. Setting: In Namibia, insurance uptake is modest but growing, and health facility density and ANC quality vary regionally. Methods: We link Namibia's 2009 Service Provision Assessment (SPA), a census of all health facilities, with the 2013 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). Using geospatial data, we construct a cluster-level ANC quality index covering structural readiness, process adherence and client experience. Multivariate regressions estimate the association between ANC quality and insurance uptake, adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic factors. Results: We find no statistically significant association between ANC quality and insurance uptake nationally. However, the relationship varies by region: in areas with low health facility density (south), higher ANC quality is marginally associated with increased insurance uptake, while no significant association is found in regions with greater facility density (north). Indicators of wealth and education consistently predict higher enrolment, regardless of ANC quality. Conclusion: Improving ANC quality is essential for health outcomes but, on its own, is unlikely to drive insurance uptake nationally. Quality appears more influential in underserved regions, while socioeconomic inequalities dominate enrolment patterns. Contribution: This study expands scarce low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) evidence on quality and insurance demand, applies a novel geospatially linked ANC quality index using a facility census and highlights the need to tailor insurance expansion strategies to subnational contexts of socioeconomic inequality and service access.

Indexed as

antenatal carehealth insuranceNamibiaquality of carespatial analysisuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID42272617
PMCPMC13247652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.