Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272613›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2026

Analysing government health expenditure in Africa: Trends, determinants and policy options.

Kelechi J Uzor, Obinna A Oty, Chizaram K Uzor, Uchenna A Amaechi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelechi J UzorHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6460-6005
Obinna A OtyFaculty of Primary Care, East Kent Hospital University Foundation Trust, Kent, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7668-7248
Chizaram K UzorFaculty of Business Administration, Hull University, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1423-3771
Uchenna A AmaechiFaculty of Global Health, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7724-4133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In April 2001, African Union (AU) Heads of State adopted the Abuja Declaration, pledging to allocate at least 15% of government expenditure to health. More than two decades later, many African health systems remain underfunded, with external aid increasingly unsustainable as official development assistance declines. Aim: This article examines progress towards the Abuja target, the role of political economy in shaping government health expenditure (GHE), and policy options for sustainable domestic financing. Setting: The authors examined the Global Health Expenditure across 53 AU Member States. Methods: The authors analysed the Global Health Expenditure Database on GHE as a proportion of total government expenditure between 2000 and 2022. Additional political economy analysis explored the governance and economic correlates of GHE. Results: Mean GHE in Africa has stalled, rising only 0.5% points since 2001. In 2022, only South Africa met the 15% Abuja benchmark, with seven countries allocating 10% - 14.9% and 45 countries allocating less than 10%. Compared to slightly better off countries, low-income countries such as Rwanda and Mozambique allocated a larger proportion of their government expenditure to health, indicating the importance of political will. Conclusion: Progress toward the Abuja target has been slow and uneven, highlighting the need for a multi-pronged approach to expand fiscal space for health, anchored in strong regional governance and accountability frameworks. Strengthening these foundations will be critical to building resilient health systems, reducing reliance on external aid, and accelerating progress toward universal health coverage in Africa. Contribution: This study advances existing research by demonstrating that political commitment and institutional factors, rather than gross domestic product per capita alone, are key determinants of health spending priorities, thereby challenging the prevailing assumption in the health financing literature that fiscal capacity is the primary driver of health budget prioritisation.

Indexed as

Abuja DeclarationAfrican Unionbudgetgovernment expenditurehealth financinghealth systems

Identifiers

PMID42272613
PMCPMC13247669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.