ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2026
The Future of Interventional Keratoconus Management: Perspectives on Integrating Epithelium-on Oxygen-Enriched Cross-Linking into Comprehensive Care Pathways.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This perspective presents a new conceptual framework for the comprehensive care of patients with keratoconus. Keratoconus is an ectatic degeneration of the cornea associated with progressive vision loss and diminished quality of life. Until recently, treatment consisted of optical correction in early stages and corneal transplantation in later stages, neither of which impacted the progressive nature of the disease. The development of corneal cross-linking-a minimally-invasive procedure that stabilizes the disease process and prevents progressive ectasia and vision loss-has significantly altered the therapeutic approach to keratoconus. Until recently, the procedure required removal of the corneal epithelium, but a newly FDA-approved epithelium-on oxygen-enriched option may simplify the process with a favorable benefit-to-risk balance. The FDA indication for this new epithelium-on treatment option also does not require disease progression, further facilitating earlier intervention. Interventional keratoconus management is a novel paradigm characterized by early diagnosis enhanced by new and emerging technology, and early proactive intervention to prevent vision loss and quality of life. Some technologies like epithelium-on oxygen-enriched cross-linking are FDA-approved, while others such as pharmaceutical treatments and customized cross-linking are in development. A decentralized coordinated effort from all eyecare providers, including optometrists, comprehensive ophthalmologists, and corneal surgeons may be necessary for identification of early cases and timely referral for early interventional cross-linking treatment. This approach facilitates preservation of vision and quality of life for patients with keratoconus; it also may reduce the economic burden of keratoconus for health systems and society by reducing the long-term costs of care as well as lost productivity and disability. Development and implementation of a viable community-based, patient-centered, interventional keratoconus care pathway will likely require expanded awareness and education regarding keratoconus and its treatment, as well as creating recommendations and guidelines for healthcare systems and providers to streamline screening, referral, and treatment processes. Given that evidence is emerging and clinical practices are evolving for this novel technology, the paper represents a modern perspective based on a synthesis of available evidence, rather than a traditional consensus guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.