Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272527›Full record

ArticleFundamental research2026

Shorebird loss increases soil CO

Chunming Li, Yizhou Sun, Peter Müller, Mark D Bertness, Baoshan Cui, Lijuan Cui, Bo Li, Qiang He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chunming LiState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observation and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Yizhou SunState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observation and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Peter MüllerInstitute for Environmental Sciences, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, 76829 Landau, Germany.
Mark D BertnessDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Baoshan CuiState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Lijuan CuiState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Bo LiState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observation and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Qiang HeState Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observation and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Countries worldwide are increasingly adopting nature-based solutions (NbS) to tackle the challenges of global climate change. One recently proposed NbS is wildlife conservation, yet the impact of wildlife on carbon emissions in ecosystems under restoration remains poorly understood. We assessed the role of shorebirds in regulating the carbon cycle of a coastal wetland under vegetation restoration, using a long-term field experiment that simulated the exacerbation of ongoing shorebird loss through shorebird exclusion. We found that compared to control treatments, shorebird exclusion significantly increased soil CO

Indexed as

BioturbationBlue carbonKeystone speciesNature-based solutionsShorebirdsSoil respirationTop-down control

Identifiers

PMID42272527
PMCPMC13247496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.