Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272512›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2026

Clinical fluorescent contrast agents for image-guided surgery.

Jingyao Wang, Yu-Si Liao, Jian-Xiao Liang, Ni-Yuan Zhang, Hong-Wei An, Hao Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biomedical imaging.Fundamental research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingyao WangCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Beijing 100190, China.
Yu-Si LiaoCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Beijing 100190, China.
Jian-Xiao LiangCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Beijing 100190, China.
Ni-Yuan ZhangCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Beijing 100190, China.
Hong-Wei AnCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Beijing 100190, China.
Hao WangCAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology (NCNST), Beijing 100190, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence image-guided surgery (FIGS) has become an essential modality to improve intraoperative decision-making by enhancing real-time visualization of anatomical structures and pathological lesions. The increasing demand for surgical precision has driven the clinical adoption of contrast agents with improved specificity, safety, and efficacy. In recent years, several drugs have been approved by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use or clinical trials, marking significant progress in this field. This review provides a comprehensive overview of seven FDA-approved intraoperative fluorescence contrast agents-Indocyanine Green (ICG), Fluorescein Sodium, 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (5-ALA), Methylene Blue (MB), Cysview (Hexaminolevulinate), Cytalux (OTL38), and Akalux-highlighting their molecular characteristics, approved indications, and clinical performance. In addition, we summarize emerging agents currently undergoing clinical evaluation, underscoring the shift from nonspecific dyes to targeted molecular probes. Through comparative analysis, we illustrate how targeted agents have enhanced tumor visualization, improved margin delineation, and facilitated detection of occult lesions, thereby contributing to more complete resections and better patient outcomes. The evolution of contrast agents reflects a broader trend toward precision medicine in surgery, where imaging tools are tailored to disease-specific biomarkers and patient-specific needs. Finally, we discuss key considerations for selecting appropriate agents in clinical practice, including tissue specificity, administration route, imaging depth, and regulatory status. Looking forward, the continued integration of molecular diagnostics and imaging is expected to enable more accurate, individualized surgical interventions and support the future development of theranostic strategies.

Indexed as

Fluorescent contrast agentsImagingNear-infraredSurgeryTumor

Identifiers

PMID42272512
PMCPMC13247500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.