Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272509›Full record

ReviewFundamental research2026

Research progress of omics technologies in forage breeding.

Yiwei Bai, Yunwei Zhang, Tianzuo Wang, Xiaojing Bi, Hui Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiwei BaiCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yunwei ZhangCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Tianzuo WangState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Xiaojing BiCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Hui WangCollege of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forages are essential to global agriculture and ecosystems, with the development of high-yield, high-quality varieties as a cornerstone of efficient agricultural practices. However, traditional genetic breeding methods, characterized by lengthy cycles and limited efficiency, fall short of meeting the demands of modern agriculture. In recent years, the rapid advancements in omics technologies, including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, have significantly transformed forage research. These tools have deepened our understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying forage growth and development, aided in identifying essential genes and metabolic pathways, and accelerated the improvement of forage varieties. This review summarizes the applications and recent advances of various omics approaches in major forage species, including alfalfa (

Indexed as

EpigenomicsForageGenomicsMetabolomicsMulti-omicsProteomicsTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42272509
PMCPMC13247505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.