ArticleFundamental research2026
Revisiting mid-long term ecosystem services projections: Integrating the interaction effects of future climate and land use changes.
Article in Fundamental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two of the most critical issues of sustainability are how future ecosystem services (ES) will change under natural and artificial stressors. To answer the above problems accurately with a quantitative manner and develop an intelligent and sustainable management of ecosystems, the projections of ES considering climate change under different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) are needed. However, current ES projection studies often lack quantitative methods to simulate ES dynamics, especially incapability to integrate the interactions between climate and land use changes on ES dynamics. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes a framework for ES simulation under climate and land use change stressors. The framework developed includes four modules: climatic attributes simulation, land use change simulation, scenario design, and ecosystem services simulation modules. Taking China as a case study, this study simulated the evolution of China's ES under the interactions between climate and land use change during the period of 2020-2100. The simulation results show that China's ES increases by 33%, 34%, 9%, and 60% under scenarios SSP1, SSP2, SSP3, and SSP5, respectively. Additionally, the overall growth rate of ES decreases by a gradually slowing rate from the mean at 1% during 2000-2020 to 0.5% during 2020-2100, respectively. Meanwhile, the ES in China shows significantly spatial variability based on simulation results. Shandong province yields the largest potential to be the key area with ES declining in the future. At ecosystem scale, increases in woodland ES are expected to dominate China's ES growth continuously. In the first four decades (2020-2060), development ways under SSP1 scenario are more helpful to promote increase in subtypes of ES, while in the last four decades (2060-2100), ES are expected to increase under SSP5 scenario. The key contributions of this study include tracking the causation and revealing the influencing mechanism of interactions of climate and land use change (rather than regional overlapping or single factor) on ES dynamics, and quantitatively simulating ES dynamics under the two integrated drivers. This study can be further extended to other cases and various scales to provide risk assessment for ecosystem services loss and detailed guidance for ecosystem conservation and management methodology with robustness and reliability in rapidly changeable environments, and critical analysis on the tradeoffs between social environmental investments and ecological welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.