Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272328›Full record

ArticleVox sanguinis2026

International survey on the management of IgA deficiency: The BEST Collaborative Study.

Renée Bazin, Mindy Goldman, Quentin G Eichbaum, Torunn Oveland Apelseth, Catherine Latour, Antoine Lewin, Nancy Robitaille, Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Collaborative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vox sanguinis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renée BazinMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Mindy GoldmanDonation Policy and Studies, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9904-9952
Quentin G EichbaumRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Torunn Oveland ApelsethNorwegian Center for Blood Preparedness, Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8823-2719
Catherine LatourTransfusion Medicine, Héma-Québec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7675-3197
Antoine LewinMedical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-4198
Nancy RobitailleTransfusion Medicine, Héma-Québec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0450-1818
Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSelective immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency is the most common human immunodeficiency, affecting approximately 1 in 500-800 individuals of European ancestry. It is defined by a serum IgA level below 7 mg/dL, with normal immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels. Since 1968, severe allergic transfusion reactions have been reported in IgA-deficient patients, often linked to anti-IgA antibodies. This led to recommendations for using IgA-deficient blood components in affected individuals. However, due to the rarity of such reactions, standardized and evidence-based guidelines are lacking, while blood services face logistical challenges maintaining registries of IgA-deficient donors and inventories of compatible products. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn international survey was conducted to assess current practices in managing IgA deficiency. The survey explored the frequency of transfusion reactions involving IgA/anti-IgA, detection methods for IgA deficiency and anti-IgA antibodies, reasons for requesting IgA-deficient products, product availability and strategies to facilitate access to IgA-deficient products.

resultsParticipants from 14 countries/regions across four continents reported a wide variability in defining IgA deficiency, criteria for recommending IgA-deficient products and anti-IgA testing practices.

conclusionThese findings highlight the need for international reference standards and harmonized recommendations to improve the management of IgA-deficient patients. Establishing harmonized best practices and evidence-based guidelines should enhance patient safety and support clinical decision making globally.

Indexed as

IgA DeficiencyAntibodies, Anti-IdiotypicFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin ASurveys and QuestionnairesAntibodies, Anti-Idiotypicanti-IgAImmunoglobulin Aanti‐IgAblood productsIgA deficiencyinternational surveypatient management guidelines

Identifiers

PMID42272328
PMCPMC13563477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.