Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272326›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026

Making Sense of the Final Moments: A Qualitative Study of Informal Caregivers' Perception of Good Death in the Bereavement Process.

Merve Işık, Ogün Asan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Merve IşıkFaculty of Health Sciences, Giresun University, Giresun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-2337
Ogün AsanIntensive Care Unit (ICU) Nurse, Giresun Training and Research Hospital, Giresun, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3239-5041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe study aimed to explore caregivers' perceptions of 'good death' following adult deaths in the intensive care unit.

backgroundUnderstanding caregivers' perceptions of 'good death' in the intensive care setting is essential to reveal how physical, emotional, spiritual and cultural dimensions shape the bereavement process.

methodA qualitative descriptive design was used. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 caregivers between June and August 2025. Participants had lost an adult relative in the intensive care unit within the previous 6-24 months (approximately June 2023-February 2025). Data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify multidimensional themes that reflected caregivers' experiences of good death.

resultsCaregivers described good death as a multilayered process extending beyond physical comfort to encompass emotional, spiritual, social, and cultural dimensions. Four themes were identified: (1) Physical and emotional comfort, (2) Meaning and spirituality, (3) Psychosocial challenges and (4) Cultural and social support. Key elements included a painless and peaceful death, the opportunity to say goodbye while conscious, the presence of relatives, autonomy, religious rituals, spiritual care, surrender to fate, social support and culturally shaped caregiving responsibilities.

conclusionFor caregivers, good death encompassed not only physical relief but also opportunities for farewell, spiritual and religious peace, social support and meaning-making. The restrictive nature of intensive care was seen as a barrier to these needs, underscoring the importance of family-oriented end-of-life practices.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathBereavementCaregiversFamilyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbereavementcaregiversend‐of‐life caregood deathintensive carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID42272326
PMCPMC13254546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.