ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Multi-Axis Stretchable Zippers for Personalized Wound Healing.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective and controlled mechanical wound closure is essential for preventing infection, promoting re-epithelialization, and minimizing scarring. However, existing wound closure technologies are limited to uniaxial closures and lack programmability, which hinders their adaptability to wounds with complex morphologies and restricts personalized treatment needs. Here, we propose a multiaxial stretchable wound zipper engineered from electrothermally driven mechanical metamaterials. The device features a hierarchical lattice of shape memory alloys, enabling six axes of stretching and programmable contraction via a smartphone. It delivers adjustable contraction force ranging from 0 to 0.494 MPa, adaptable to diverse wound geometries, with a rapid response time of approximately 1.73 s. In the rat model, the device achieved near-instantaneous closure of linear wounds and improved the circular wound-healing rate by 35.91% compared with the control group. Mechanistically, the programmable mechanical contraction promoted vascular regeneration, re-epithelialization, and collagen matrix remodeling, ultimately accelerating personalized wound healing. The device achieved rapid, robust, and programmable multiaxial contraction, demonstrating substantial potential for personalized wound management and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.