ArticleAcute and critical care2026
Beyond blood pressure: a comprehensive overview of clinical indices in shock and tissue hypoperfusion.
Article in Acute and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shock is a state of circulatory failure characterized by impaired tissue perfusion due to a mismatch between oxygen delivery and consumption. While macrocirculation serves as a conduit to sustain blood flow toward the microcirculatory networks, it is the microcirculation that ultimately ensures the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to maintain cellular and organ function. The maintenance of proper macrocirculation is essential, but it does not necessarily indicate adequate microcirculation or recovery from shock. Thus, assessment of the microcirculation is also required to confirm effective tissue oxygenation. A comprehensive evaluation of both circulatory levels is crucial for accurate diagnosis and prognostication in patients with shock. This review explores a diverse range of clinical, biochemical, and device-based indicators that reflect the perfusion status of patients in shock. By examining their physiological significance and clinical relevance, we aim to provide a comprehensive framework for the hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients and support the use of multidimensional strategies in shock management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.