Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42272196›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026

Patient Perspectives, Unmet Needs and Dilemmas in Reproductive Decision-making for Genodermatoses: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Fauve C A P Van Veen, Otte J M Borghouts, Julia M K Clabbers, Peter M Steijlen, Karin Veldman, Femke Tammer, Michel Van Geel, Klara Mosterd, Liesbeth Van Osch, Malou Heijligers and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fauve C A P Van VeenDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. fauve.van.veen@mumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-7786-4144
Otte J M BorghoutsDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Julia M K ClabbersDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9885-3452
Peter M SteijlenDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-0380
Karin VeldmanDutch patient association for Ichthyosis Networks, Assen, Netherlands; European Network Ichthyosis, Kürten, Germany; Patient Advocacy Group of the European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Skin Diseases (ERN Skin ePAG), Paris, France.
Femke TammerDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Michel Van GeelDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0273-8020
Klara MosterdDepartment of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9065-3050
Liesbeth Van OschDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8157-1870
Malou Heijligers *GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-8278
Antoni H Gostyński *Department of Dermatology, Maastricht UMC+ Centre of Expertise for Genodermatoses, University of Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands; GROW school for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-2914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impact on quality of life due to inherited skin diseases (also known as genodermatoses) may lead to reproductive dilemmas for affected couples or individuals considering parenthood. Currently, little is known about reproductive decision-making (RDM) for those affected by or at-risk of genodermatoses. Couples/individuals' perspectives with genodermatoses were qualitatively explored by focusing on (i) the impact of these diseases on the desire to have children, (ii) the knowledge of different reproductive options and personal considerations and, (iii) experiences with reproductive counselling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants aged ≥16 years, diagnosed with a genodermatosis, and an active, (un)fulfilled or future desire to have children and analysed using a reflexive thematic content approach. Thirty participants were interviewed until saturation. Two main themes and 9 subthemes were identified. Participants preferred wanting to avoid passing on their genodermatosis to offspring, thereby complicating RDM. This preference was influenced by negative experiences with the disease, resulting in fear and uncertainty about severe manifestations in offspring. Positives and shortcomings in clinical practice were expressed, particularly the lack of reproductive counselling as a standard part of care. This study highlights the substantial impact of genodermatoses in RDM and the importance of routine reproductive counselling for those affected by or at-risk of genodermatoses.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services Needs and DemandNeeds AssessmentReproductionSkin Diseases, GeneticAdolescentAdultCost of IllnessFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID42272196
PMCPMC13253761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.