ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2026
'We're Not Mental Health': Perspectives of Emergency Department Clinicians on Trauma-Informed Care.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to potentially psychologically traumatic events is extremely common, impacting both physical and mental health. Trauma-exposed people are more likely to access emergency care than their non-trauma-exposed counterparts, and they risk symptom exacerbation and re-traumatisation during the care process. Trauma-informed care (TIC) practices may provide better experiences for these patients. However, TIC understanding and implementation in emergency settings remains limited. Therefore, the current study aimed to explore how emergency clinicians perceive, conceptualise and enact TIC in their practice. Twenty emergency clinicians (2 doctors, 18 nurses) from one metropolitan hospital participated in semi-structured interviews about their understanding and use of TIC. Reflexive thematic analysis of this qualitative data generated three themes: (1) 'treat the person not the problem', (2) 'we're not mental health' and (3) 'systemic factors that we can't fix'. When brought together, these themes suggested that emergency clinicians perceived TIC to be a holistic, person-centred practice designed to treat psychological trauma. This therefore displaced the responsibility for TIC from emergency clinicians onto others. Adoption of TIC practices was further impeded by perceived systemic barriers like competing priorities and working conditions fostering burnout. The findings suggest that systemic changes and TIC education for emergency clinicians are needed to support TIC implementation, which may in turn produce better patient experiences and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.