ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Span Efficiency of Flying Animals.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Span efficiency, a metric representing the efficiency of lift generation in flying animals, has been measured for birds, bats, and insects using particle image velocimetry over the past two decades. However, inconsistencies in capture and data analysis methods have introduced systematic biases, preventing a unified and fair comparison across diverse taxonomic groups and body sizes. Here, we quantify the impact of these methodological discrepancies using a computational fluid dynamics method, then standardize and synthesise span efficiency data from all thirty species measured to date. We apply a phylogenetic comparative method to evaluate how morphological and kinematic parameters affect span efficiency. Our analysis reveals that efficiency strongly correlates with body mass, suggests that larger flying animals may face stronger selective pressure for high span efficiency. Furthermore, simple theoretical span efficiency predictions for gliding and rotating flight-derived from wing planform and theoretical models-are correlated empirical values enabling reliable predictions of span efficiency in species that have not been measured. As an example of this morphology-based theoretical prediction, we compare the orange oakleaf butterfly, which has a wing planform that closely resembles a leaf for cryptic camouflage, with the migratory monarch butterfly. The monarch butterfly has a substantially higher predicted efficiency, quantifying the aerodynamic cost associated with mimicry. Ultimately, this study sheds new light on the interplay between physical constraints and lineage-specific adaptive strategies in biological flight, while providing a versatile framework to evaluate an aspect of flight performance from wing morphology without the need for intensive wind tunnel experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.