SynthesisWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2026
Short-term relief or long-term solution? A comparison between endoscopic stenting and gastrojejunostomy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction.
Synthesis in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMalignant gastric outlet obstruction is the consequence of advanced cancer resulting in mechanical obstruction to gastric emptying. Traditionally, surgical bypass (GJ) is performed and is known for its durability but also for its high morbidity. In contrast, endoscopic stenting (ES) is less invasive option but carries a notable risk of stent dysfunction and the need for subsequent reinterventions. These patients usually have limited life expectancy with reduced quality of life. The aim of this study is to review the different treatment options and compare their safety and efficacy.
methodWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing GJ to ES for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). Comprehensive search of electronic databases between January 2001 and December 2022 was performed to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes assessed were length of stay, reintervention rate, procedure-related complications and secondary outcome was mortality.
results32 articles were abstracted in this meta-analysis with a total of 3296 patients. The re-intervention pooled risk ratio was 0.34 (95% CI 0.22, 0.52), indicating the risk of reintervention was lower among patients who underwent GJ. However, the results were comparable between ES and GJ for procedure-related complications and mortality. The length of stay was higher among those who underwent GJ, with a weighted mean difference of 11.2 days (95% CI 4.4, 18.1).
conclusionGJ bypass was associated with lower risk of re-intervention and comparable mortality and procedure-related complications compared to ES in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction, despite also being associated with longer length of stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.