Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42271465›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Automatic detection of moral information: evidence from visual mismatch response (vMMR).

Bo Sun, Shasha Guo, Zenghua Xing, Xixi Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo SunInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Shasha GuoInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Zenghua XingInstitute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Xixi GuSchool of Sociology, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China. guxixi627@gmail.com.

Funding

China University of Political Science and Law Research start-up Fund project 1000/01140065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA theoretical debate persists regarding whether moral judgment is primarily driven by moral intuition or moral reasoning. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether moral information is processed automatically, despite the social intuitionist model's assertion that moral judgments arise from rapid, intuitive processes.

methodTo investigate the automaticity of moral judgment, the present study employed the visual mismatch response (vMMR) as an electrophysiological marker. The vMMR is an event-related potential component that indexes the brain's automatic detection of environmental changes. Using a reversed block design, we presented moral and immoral stimuli while manipulating task relevance.

resultsThe results revealed that only immoral stimuli elicited an early vMMR, and its amplitude was unaffected by task relevance. In contrast, both moral and immoral stimuli elicited a late vMMR.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the automatic detection of moral information, consistent with the notion of moral intuition, occurs during the early stage of moral judgment and operates as a highly automatic and negatively biased process. Moreover, the presence of both early and late vMMR indicates that moral judgment involves multi-stage automatic processing, encompassing both rapid deviance detection and subsequent, more elaborate automatic analysis.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsJudgmentMoralsVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansIntuitionMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultEvent-related potentials (ERPs)Moral intuitionMoral judgmentVisual mismatch response

Identifiers

PMID42271465
PMCPMC13474517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.