ArticleBMC psychology2026
Automatic detection of moral information: evidence from visual mismatch response (vMMR).
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA theoretical debate persists regarding whether moral judgment is primarily driven by moral intuition or moral reasoning. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether moral information is processed automatically, despite the social intuitionist model's assertion that moral judgments arise from rapid, intuitive processes.
methodTo investigate the automaticity of moral judgment, the present study employed the visual mismatch response (vMMR) as an electrophysiological marker. The vMMR is an event-related potential component that indexes the brain's automatic detection of environmental changes. Using a reversed block design, we presented moral and immoral stimuli while manipulating task relevance.
resultsThe results revealed that only immoral stimuli elicited an early vMMR, and its amplitude was unaffected by task relevance. In contrast, both moral and immoral stimuli elicited a late vMMR.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that the automatic detection of moral information, consistent with the notion of moral intuition, occurs during the early stage of moral judgment and operates as a highly automatic and negatively biased process. Moreover, the presence of both early and late vMMR indicates that moral judgment involves multi-stage automatic processing, encompassing both rapid deviance detection and subsequent, more elaborate automatic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.