ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Patient‑specific 3D‑printed Ti‑6Al‑4 V sternum-rib implant for near‑total sternal resection: operational blueprint, implant design principles, and intermediate clinical outcome.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLarge sternal resections jeopardize chest-wall rigidity and cardiopulmonary protection. Conventional reconstructions often trade anatomical conformity for convenience. Three-dimensional planning and patient-specific titanium (Ti-6Al-4 V) implants may reconcile oncologic goals with stable mechanics; however, detailed end-to-end workflows are seldom reported.
methodsWe implemented a CT-to-implant workflow - segmentation, virtual resection, CAD with lateral rib-coupling flanges and soft-tissue eyelets, polymer prototype rehearsal, additive manufacturing, and single-stage implantation - for a 28-year-old man with a sternal giant cell tumor. Near-total sternectomy was followed by rigid prosthetic fixation to a manubrial sliver, xiphoid remnant, and medial rib stumps. Double-layer polypropylene mesh (deep barrier and superficial buttress) and preserved pectoral muscle coverage enabled flap-less soft-tissue reconstruction.
resultsEstimated blood loss was 300 ml. The patient was extubated on table, the subcutaneous drain was removed on postoperative day 2, the intercostal drain on postoperative day 5, and total hospital stay was 5 days. Recovery was uncomplicated with oral-analgesic pain control and satisfactory early function. The cost of the prosthesis was INR 180,000 (approximately US$1,950). Final histopathology confirmed giant cell tumor with negative margins (R0 resection). Preoperative spirometry showed a restrictive pattern; repeat spirometry at approximately 1 month showed an overall improvement of about 20% in major parameters, although the original postoperative printout was not retrievable. At 6-month follow-up, the patient had resumed work and reported only intermittent mild pain not requiring analgesics.
conclusionWe present a pragmatic operational blueprint for patient-specific sternal reconstruction that highlights anchorage strategy, rib coupling, and soft-tissue suspension. The case demonstrates feasibility in a specialized multidisciplinary setting, but longer-term oncologic, functional, and implant-durability data remain necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.