ArticleGenome biology2026
Metabolic disease variants rewire gene regulation through disruption of DNA G-quadruplex structures.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe global prevalence of metabolic diseases (MetDs) continues to rise and is associated with an increased cancer risk. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) linked to MetDs, some within genes also implicated in tumorigenesis. G-quadruplexes (G4s) are non-canonical DNA secondary structures that regulate gene expression in diverse and context dependent ways. Variants affecting G4 structure may alter transcriptional efficiency. Notably, disease-associated variants are frequently located within or near regulatory elements and may overlap with cancer-associated alternative promoters.
resultsWe systematically assess the overlap between MetD-associated SNVs and G4 motifs, and evaluate their effects on G4 stability, topology, and their potential to modulate the regulatory activity of G4s in alternative promoters. Approximately 0.9% to 1.6% of MetD-associated SNVs are located within G4 motifs (G4-SNVs), depending on the prediction tool. Effect alleles, those associated with risk or protection against MetDs, generally reduce G4 stability, regardless of their direction of association. Several G4-SNVs are mapped to cancer-associated alternative promoters, including the destabilizing MICB rs2855804 C/T variant and the stabilizing PLA2G6 rs2277844 G/A variants. In vivo G4 formation is confirmed by permanganate/S1 nuclease footprinting coupled with sequencing, while circular dichroism spectroscopy reveals allele-specific changes in G4 topology and stability. Integration of Hi-C data, histone modifications, transcription factor binding, and luciferase reporter assays further support their regulatory impact.
conclusionsAlthough G4-SNVs are unlikely to be the sole disease drivers, they significantly influence transcriptional regulation, potentially contributing to allele-specific gene expression in MetD patients and their link to increased cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.