ArticleBMC health services research2026
Assessing connection to outpatient care among patients screening positive for previously undiagnosed diabetes in the emergency department: a combined retrospective cohort and prospective cohort survey study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with frequent emergency department (ED) use often have poor connection to primary care, limiting access to preventive screening. Screening patients at risk for diabetes is essential to ensure early treatment via medication and lifestyle changes. While ED screening programs have shown success in diagnosing diabetes, it is unknown the impact on follow-up with subsequent care, and thus downstream patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of an emergency department (ED)-based diabetes screening program, assessing follow-up for subsequent management, if patients changed health behaviors or initiated medications, and barriers reported to follow-up if patients did not establish care.
methodsScreening results and patient data from four ED sites of a health system were retrospectively collected; we then performed a phone-based survey of all patients diagnosed with diabetes via ED screening over one year. Patients were queried about diagnosis awareness, connection to follow-up or barriers to establishing care, and health behavior changes (diet, exercise, medications).
resultsOf 9,897 screened ED patients, 615 (6.2%) had diabetes. We surveyed 307 patients (50% response rate). Among newly diagnosed patients; 79% reported obtaining outpatient care, but only 46% recalled ED diagnosis. Health behavior changes included 65% reporting diet improvement, 35% increasing exercise, and 52% starting diabetes medication. Patients who failed to follow-up reported barriers including awareness of screening result, time/scheduling issues, and financial considerations.
conclusionThis study assesses the reported rate of outpatient care following diabetes diagnosis via an ED screening program and identifies barriers experienced by patients who did not obtain follow-up. Improved connections between screening programs and subsequent care are needed to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.